What is not as old is the way advertisers handle it. But I remain convinced that the source of the dilemma between a no-ad attitude and Web sites’ survival is that of advertisers and not of users.Īdvertisement is as old as humanity, to bring to one’s attention a product. This is complexity in a non-complicated scheme.
Tim, greater sympathy than I therefor when I score 0%!īut I nevertheless consider mistaking my sympathies with an ideal reality would be dishonest. Some are bold enough to suggest that your computer is infected, and prey on audiences gullible enough to believe in them. Not only do they waste time, they cause computer systems to work harder (especially bad on hard drives), and can randomly infect your system with malware just by viewing them (see Malvertising). The ad machines run on pure unadulterated greed, and nothing else. There are other funding outlets available (donations/crowdfunding/etc), but websites refuse them because ads still make them more bank. I don’t care if Adblock is breaking the internet. Of the 100+ apps I’ve downloaded to my phone, only 5% of them actually have ads, because I have paid so many licenses to remove them from the others. I have been using Adblock for so long, I have almost forgotten an internet with ads. Websites that force you disable Adblock have the exact opposite effect on me I never visit. I never allow any ads, as I do not believe in its system.
0 kommentar(er)
